<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beginning with the End in Mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/</link>
	<description>Musings about Academic Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:30:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonmott</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>jonmott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmott.com/blog/?p=4#comment-971</guid>
		<description>This is helpful clarification. There are clearly learning problems and delivery problems. I wonder how seperate and distinct they are. For the purposes of organizing and classifying our goals, we use the Sloan-C Five Pillars (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sloan-c.org/5pillars&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sloan-c.org/5pillars&lt;/a&gt;). One of the pillars is access/flexibility. I think this captures the &quot;delivery problem&quot; angle you&#039;re thinking about. Perhaps we&#039;re not terribly concerned in a particular case about how well learning goals are being acheived--what we really want is to make learning opportunities available to a broader, more diverse audience. This is absolutely one of the &quot;ends&quot; we can and should focus on in teaching &amp; learning technology projects . . . &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words, the &quot;end in mind&quot; doesn&#039;t always have to be student learning. In fact, learning outcomes is but ONE of Sloan&#039;s five pillars. As mentioned, access is another. The other three are cost effectiveness/scalability, student satisfaction and faculty satisfaction. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for prompting clarfication. I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is helpful clarification. There are clearly learning problems and delivery problems. I wonder how seperate and distinct they are. For the purposes of organizing and classifying our goals, we use the Sloan-C Five Pillars (<a href="http://www.sloan-c.org/5pillars" rel="nofollow">http://www.sloan-c.org/5pillars</a>). One of the pillars is access/flexibility. I think this captures the &#8220;delivery problem&#8221; angle you&#39;re thinking about. Perhaps we&#39;re not terribly concerned in a particular case about how well learning goals are being acheived&#8211;what we really want is to make learning opportunities available to a broader, more diverse audience. This is absolutely one of the &#8220;ends&#8221; we can and should focus on in teaching &#038; learning technology projects . . . </p>
<p>In other words, the &#8220;end in mind&#8221; doesn&#39;t always have to be student learning. In fact, learning outcomes is but ONE of Sloan&#39;s five pillars. As mentioned, access is another. The other three are cost effectiveness/scalability, student satisfaction and faculty satisfaction. </p>
<p>Thanks for prompting clarfication. I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmott.com/blog/?p=4#comment-970</guid>
		<description>Often I find that the &quot;problem&quot; is merely, &quot;How do we do this at a distance, (a)synchronously?&quot; THis shares some aspects of but is still different from the &quot;administrivia&quot; example you provide.  Technology is in that instance a tool to solve not a learning problem but a delivery problem--in your thinking about technology as a tool to solve a problem, do you dwell much or differentiate between learning and delivery problems? It almost seems like one is macro and the other is micro, but I haven&#039;t dwelt on that idea much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often I find that the &#8220;problem&#8221; is merely, &#8220;How do we do this at a distance, (a)synchronously?&#8221; THis shares some aspects of but is still different from the &#8220;administrivia&#8221; example you provide.  Technology is in that instance a tool to solve not a learning problem but a delivery problem&#8211;in your thinking about technology as a tool to solve a problem, do you dwell much or differentiate between learning and delivery problems? It almost seems like one is macro and the other is micro, but I haven&#39;t dwelt on that idea much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End in Mind &#187; Demonstrating a Significant Difference</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>The End in Mind &#187; Demonstrating a Significant Difference</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmott.com/blog/?p=4#comment-232</guid>
		<description>[...] evaluating the impact of teaching &amp; learning technology (and getting beyond the NSD problem) begins with the end in mind. The first and essential step in this approach is to begin any teaching &amp; learning with [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] evaluating the impact of teaching &#38; learning technology (and getting beyond the NSD problem) begins with the end in mind. The first and essential step in this approach is to begin any teaching &#38; learning with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The End in Mind &#187; The More Things Change . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.jonmott.com/blog/2008/06/beginning-with-the-end-in-mind/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>The End in Mind &#187; The More Things Change . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 22:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonmott.com/blog/?p=4#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] do we persist in pouring the same old wine into new (and shinier) bottles? The reasons are many. But at least one significant driver of this phenomenon is that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do we persist in pouring the same old wine into new (and shinier) bottles? The reasons are many. But at least one significant driver of this phenomenon is that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

